Re: Pine/PC-Pine 4.64 update?
Vince LaMonica <[email protected]> Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:58:51 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.pine.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | The last best hope for peace |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Matt Ackeret wrote: } If you keep email on an IMAP server, how would you be risking anything? } } (yeah I guess this is mostly a vote for using an IMAP server..) Oh, I *do* use an IMAP server [UW's of course]. But what if an MUA does something such that it corrupts the currently viewed mailbox? I've got over 7 GBs of e.mail on my IMAP server, and though it is backed up daily/weekly/monthly, there's still a chance that corruption could affect a mailbox that hasn't been backed up yet. I do use procmail to do 'instant' backups as well [in fact, before Pine sees any e.mail, it first gets gziped into particular files, then delivered to its destination]. But I'd rather not live on the "bleeding edge" with regards to using an MUA for production purposes. I've had corruption occur once since I began with Pine back with v3.83 [i always thought i started w/ v3.89, but i was using pine before dec, 1993]. Granted that corruption occurred with PC-Pine [which i used for 9 months in 2000 in a Windows-only Exchange environment], but it left an everlasting impression. Yes, Exchange != IMAP, but I don't know if it was PC-Pine or Exchange that caused the issue. Could something similar happen with a beta of *any* MUA using IMAP? I remember early versions of Evolution, which caused my IMAP server to beg for mercy [and i was doing as i suggested above, and testing Evo on a test account that contained copies of everything in my main account]. I *do* test a lot of software, fill out bug reports, etc. I have no problem trying out Alpine, as I know many people with more e.mail than me, using it. My problem is that I don't want to be 'forced' to use an alpha release MUA as my primary MUA. Nobody is forcing me to do that, of course, but if bugs/security patches are only being applied to Alpine, a young, not yet beta program, and not being applied to Pine, a mature, stable program, that seems to be to be unfair to those who are simply waiting for Alpine to be blessed as "version 1". I hope that made sense, and I thank you for listening [and for producing a kick-butt IMAP server and MUA]. /vjl/ -- Vince J. LaMonica Knowledge is knowing a street is one way. [email protected] <*> Wisdom is still looking in both directions. When there's nothing else to read: http://www.vjl.org/ _______________________________________________ Pine-info mailing list [email protected] http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/pine-info