Re: Pine/PC-Pine 4.64 update?

On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Vince LaMonica wrote:
>On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Barry Landy wrote:
>
>} Why not wait for Alpine - (almost) completely Pine compatible and is 
>} after all really Pine 5.
>
>While that is good and all, Alpine is not even considered beta software 
>yet, according to http://www.washington.edu/alpine/. While I will gladly 
>test software, there is no way I will risk alpha/beta software with 
>e.mail. I find e.mail to be too valuable to risk testing new apps on it. 

If you keep email on an IMAP server, how would you be risking anything?

(yeah I guess this is mostly a vote for using an IMAP server..)
_______________________________________________
Pine-info mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/pine-info