[pfx] Re: Current TLS cipher/protocol recommendations for postfix?

Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.postfix.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dnia 31.03.2026 o godz. 14:23:12 Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users pisze:
> I also think this is all theater right now, as in the absence of MTA/STS,
> postfix could refuse to talk <tls1.2 and the result would be "mail being
> delivered in the clear". (We have not yet moved to requiring TLS via
> MTA-STS).
> 
> So my question: Are the defaults (>=TLSv1) still sane?  Or is it "worth"
> turning this up to >=TLSv1.2?

It's just a stupid company applying some stupid checklist (probably meant
for HTTPS) to something they don't understand. As usual with all those
"rating", "assessing" or "scoring" companies - they usually don't understand
what they're talking about, regardless of the matter, and the companies that
understand even less trust them blindly, nobody knows why.
-- 
Regards,
   Jaroslaw Rafa
   [email protected]
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.