gmane.mail.postfix.user

293625 articles on record, showing the most recent 50.

[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 17:42:44 -0400
Jim Seymour via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294134
[pfx] New to Postfix, Google problems
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 19:11:08 +0100
Joe via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294133
[pfx] Re: 2 Default postfix instances
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 04:29:44 +0000
Michael via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294132
[pfx] Re: 2 Default postfix instances
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 13:12:43 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294131
[pfx] Re: 2 Default postfix instances
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 19:06:00 -0400
Christophe Kalt via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294130
[pfx] Re: 2 Default postfix instances
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 22:29:37 +0000
Michael via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294129
[pfx] Re: 2 Default postfix instances
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 23:50:05 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294128
[pfx] 2 Default postfix instances
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:50:04 +0000
Michael via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294127
[pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue?
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:30:12 -0400
pgnd via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294126
[pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue?
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 14:22:40 +0200
Edmund Lodewijks via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294125
[pfx] Re: Question about the parameter: permit_mx_backup_networks
Sun, 26 Jul 2026 08:23:12 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294124
[pfx] Re: Question about the parameter: permit_mx_backup_networks
Sun, 26 Jul 2026 13:41:39 +0200
Klaus Tachtler via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294123
[pfx] Re: transport map multiple nexthop with ip address
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 12:38:53 -0700
Randy Bush via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294122
[pfx] Re: transport map multiple nexthop with ip address
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 15:32:21 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294121
[pfx] transport map multiple nexthop with ip address
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 12:06:41 -0700
Randy Bush via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294120
[pfx] Re: Question about the parameter: permit_mx_backup_networks
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 09:34:15 -0400
Jim Seymour via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294119
[pfx] Re: Question about the parameter: permit_mx_backup_networks
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 07:06:00 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294118
[pfx] Re: destination_rate_delay
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 09:50:10 +0200
Thomas Franz via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294117
[pfx] Question about the parameter: permit_mx_backup_networks
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 07:31:58 +0200
Klaus Tachtler via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294116
[pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue?
Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:49:05 -0400
pgnd via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294115
[pfx] Re: destination_rate_delay
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 02:33:21 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294114
[pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue?
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 02:31:22 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294113
[pfx] destination_rate_delay
Fri, 24 Jul 2026 11:59:04 +0200
Thomas Franz via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294112
[pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue?
Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:09:44 -0400
pgnd via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294111
[pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue?
Thu, 23 Jul 2026 21:01:09 +0200
Edmund Lodewijks via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294110
[pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue?
Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:55:38 +0200
Dusan Obradovic via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294109
[pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue?
Thu, 23 Jul 2026 13:16:18 -0400
pgnd via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294108
[pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue?
Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:03:07 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294107
[pfx] dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue?
Thu, 23 Jul 2026 09:05:34 -0400
pgnd via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294106
[pfx] Re: [ext] Re: postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter"
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:58:23 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294105
[pfx] Re: [ext] Re: postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter"
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:46:57 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294104
[pfx] Re: [ext] Re: postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter"
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 21:22:42 +0200
Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294103
[pfx] Re: postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter"
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:05:09 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294102
[pfx] Re: postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter"
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:53:40 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294101
[pfx] postfix check reporting all (!) my ldap:// maps containing "unused parameter"
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:09:43 +0200
Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294100
[pfx] Re: Question about postfix cleanup
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 10:26:29 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294099
[pfx] Re: Question about postfix cleanup
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 16:05:27 +0200
fc26wuqa--- via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294098
[pfx] Re: Question about postfix cleanup
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:59:51 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294097
[pfx] Question about postfix cleanup
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:01:04 +0200
fc26wuqa--- via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294096
[pfx] Re: dual server configuration
Sun, 19 Jul 2026 09:27:16 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294095
[pfx] Re: dual server configuration
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 19:31:20 -0400
postfix--- via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294094
[pfx] Re: dual server configuration
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 19:30:25 -0400
postfix--- via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294093
[pfx] Re: dual server configuration
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 10:52:08 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294092
[pfx] Re: dual server configuration
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 07:57:19 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294091
[pfx] Re: dual server configuration
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 01:35:20 +0200
Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294090
[pfx] Re: dual server configuration
Fri, 17 Jul 2026 16:43:38 -0400
postfix--- via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294089
[pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451
Fri, 17 Jul 2026 11:18:36 +0200
Dmytro Alieksieiev via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294088
[pfx] Re: cleanup(8): recipient_canonical can emit an over-long socketmap query with no operator guard; PERM then retried as 451
Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:01:10 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294087
[pfx] Re: multiline headers sent to milters
Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:51:31 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294086
[pfx] Re: multiline headers sent to milters
Thu, 16 Jul 2026 15:27:29 +0000
Claus Assmann via Postfix-users <[email protected]> • #294085