[pfx] Re: Encrypted connections only
Paul van der Vlis via Postfix-users <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.postfix.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Victor, Op 03-04-2026 om 15:14 schreef Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 03:04:06PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis via Postfix-users wrote: > >> There is certainly something to criticize about your domain, isn't there? No >> DMARC or SPF policy, and you support ciphers like ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 that >> are no longer secure. > > The lack of DMARC and SPF is quite deliberate, and aligns well with my > threat model. And See section 8.1 of RFC7672 for the reason why ADH > ciphers are supported with TLS 1.2. Some day I might publish a > specification for a null-certifiacate type with TLS 1.3, but poking > that hornet's hasn't yet been a priority. > >> I think it's correct that you don't get 100% ;-) > > You're of cours free to apply your criteria to your own domains. > Assuming that your threat model and risk analysis is universally > applicable seems unwise. My "smtpd_tls_security_level = encrypt" and my tls_policy are of course very debatable, and I don't know if I should leave it like this. At the moment it's only a test-server, an account on it is [email protected]. Some people even say that I should enable TLS 1.0. > I am also free to question the universality of "internet.nl"'s choices. of course ;-) With regards, Paul -- Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer Groningen https://vandervlis.nl/ _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]