[pfx] Re: help debugging SASL authentication failure: No worthy mechs found

Marvin Renich via Postfix-users <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.postfix.user
Message-ID <adF2igOtgD/[email protected]>
* Greg Klanderman via Postfix-users <[email protected]> [260404 15:06]:
> Hi Marvin,
> 
> Thank you for your reply.. that matches what I see.
> 
> I had not realized recommends were installed by default.. I was
> wondering how those and suggests differed but hadn't gotten to looking
> it up yet.
> 
> I had not used --no-install-recommends, simply 'apt install postfix'
> and libsasl2-modules was not installed.

[snip]

> The following day, it shows that I ran 'apt upgrade' and libsasl2-2
> was upgraded, but not libsasl2-modules (which appears to have matching
> versioning).
> 
> I have to conclude that libsasl2-2 must have already been installed,
> without libsasl2-modules, when I installed postfix.
> 
> Does that make sense?  Since it was not installing libsasl2-2, the
> recommends: libsasl2-modules was not considered, only the postfix
> package suggests: libsasl2-modules.

Exactly.

> Maybe it would make sense for postfix to directly recommend: rather
> than suggest: libsasl2-modules?

I don't think so, but I'm not sure.  The Debian maintainer would be the
person to decide this.

...Marvin

_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.