[pfx] Re: Will MTA-STS support and tlsrpt ever wind up in mainline postfix?

Byunghee HWANG (황병희) via Postfix-users <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.postfix.user
Organization 金陵 (연원의 마음)
Message-ID <[email protected]>
(Hellow Dan and sorry for off-topic)

Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users <[email protected]> writes:

> Folks,
>
> Are these features on the roadmap in the future in mainline at any
> point, or is the current way of doing things (snawoot's
> mta-sts-resolver and sys4's libtlsrpt) basically the canonical method?
> (...)

As just an ordinary user, i adopted MTA-STS for purely personal reasons
that differed slightly from its original intent. It was a means to
increase the transmission rate to Google, rather than for security. So,
i am simply satisfied with just "testing (mta-sts policy)".

However, if someone creates a more beautiful implementation of MTA-STS,
i plan to use it with gratitude.

Thank you for posting this topic.


Sincerely, Byunghee

-- 
^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))//

_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 227 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYIAB0WIQRqpiVRMuVtH3ALfA6mdGCB9LBsVwUCadHUpgAKCRCmdGCB9LBs
VyTHAQCMtkye+ISXn0GE7xskmyXwVaXKhotOxzs0NK7NNidssgD9GsZMraKwQ9b8
qUmeOIzETYSZn+kceiUhpbgPP/LEgAk=
=VObE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.