[pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"?
Mel P via Postfix-users <[email protected]> Wed, 27 May 2026 11:29:58 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.postfix.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-05-27 10:50, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: > Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users: >> * Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: >>> Mel P via Postfix-users: >>> >>>> IMHO, that last reinforces the idea that it's time to retire the >>>> unique handling of inet_protocols, or at least change it to >>>> "inet_protocols = all" >>> >>> That may be so for big providers, but what percentage of Postfix >>> sites has IPv6 connectivity? Turning on Postfix IPv6 support without >>> IPv6 connectivity would do no harm for the Postfix SMTP server, but >>> it would be harmul for the SMTP client. >> >> I might be missing something, but how would the SMTP server supporting >> both IPv4 and IPv6 by default be harmful for the SMTP client? And what >> is "the" SMTP client in the case you envision? > > Turning on Postfix IPv6 support without IPv6 connectivity would do > no harm for the Postfix SMTP server. > > Turning on Postfix IPv6 support without IPv6 connectivity would be > harmul for the Postfix SMTP client. IME worst case there's a few seconds delay when there's a partial network outage, but fallback is otherwise reliably seamless and instantaneous. _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]