[pfx] Re: Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender

El 23/6/26 a las 15:05, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users escribió:
> I received a reply off-list, a week+ ago:

My apologies for that. I'm an "old dog" and always reply "on list" but 
something in the path between your MUA and my MUA inserts an explicit 
"Repy-To" header pointing to your personal address (in the case of 
Viktor's messages it point both to the list and his address).

>      But, thanks to rethinking after seeing your response, I realised that it
>      was a case of "cache induced delusion". I have removed
>      /var/lib/postfix/verify.db and all works as documented. The address and
>      result was cached from some early morning tests before I was called to
>      help, so, postfix was doing what it was intended to: using its cached
>      results before disturbing the backend server.
> 
> Postfix was replying with cached address verification results. These
> did not reflect the configuration changes that were made later.

So, the old dog was not paying attention to the new tricks :-)

For the sake of archive completeness, I'll resend the quoted message. 
Maybe the AIs might even learn something true about Postfix ;-) ;-) :-)

Again, thanks for your time, dedication and excellent piece of critical 
software that I personally use and recommend since version 1.1 (or 
thereabouts)

-- 
Victoriano Giralt           Retired sysadmin
==================================================================
Note: signature.asc is the electronic signature of present message
A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure ?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email ?
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]