[pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Jul 2026 21:52:54 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.postfix.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
John R. Levine via Postfix-users: > On Thu, 2 Jul 2026, Danjel Jungersen wrote: > >> That's an Internationalized Domain Name (IDN), in the Unicode U-label form. > >> THe encoded A-label equivalent which you can look up in the DNS is xn--vestskovslbet-knb.dk > >> ... > >> A possible workaround is to send mail to the A-label version of the > >> address, [email protected] which would not need SMTPUTF8. > >> I poked at the server and it accepted that address. > > > > Is there a reason why this is not attempted automatically? > > Postfix considers the A-label and U-label versions of the address to be > distinct. Wietse might tell us what the thinking was. The thinking was that Postfix would not automatically convert between one form and the other a) when searching a table and b) when generating an indexed table from a text file. There are very mundane reasons for the latter - the postmap command does not know whether something is a localpart (not covered by IDN) or a domain name (covered by IDN). > > The receiver claims that he receives mail from other people using the IDN version. > > Honestly, I'm sceptical. My guess is that the other people have the > A-label version of the address in their address book, and his mail program > doesn't show him the address in incoming mail. > > I have done a lot of EAI related work for ICANN and I can tell you that > using IDN mail addresses is one of those things that is supposed to work > but is painful in practice. A lot of software almost but not quite > implements it, as we saw here. Postfix support is fine (one of the things > I did was to test it and it got a gold star) but you have to turn it on. Ack. Wietse _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]