[pfx] Re: file system clock is 1 seconds ahead of local clock

Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.postfix.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Michael Orlitzky via Postfix-users:
> This is on a linux/glibc system, so I was curious about futimes(). The
> last mention of proc was removed from glibc's futimes() in 2014, when
> the mininum supported version of the linux kernel was bumped past
> 2.6.22:
> 
>   * https://repo.or.cz/glibc.git/commitdiff/cecf2ed43
>   * https://repo.or.cz/glibc.git/commitdiff/d0f5b3f85
> 
> According to its NEWS file, this was in glibc-2.24. Should HAS_FUTIMES
> now be defined on this platform, sparing me from figuring out what is
> going on with my clock?

https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/futimes.3.html says:

   ENOSYS The /proc filesystem could not be accessed.

This suggests that futimes() can still depend on /proc.

> NB: grep suggests that HAS_FUTIMES_AT and HAS_FUTIMESAT do not agree
> on that underscore.

The macro 'HAS_FUTIMESAT' appears in code for Solaris (SUNOS5)
systems. No-one seems to complain.

	Wietse
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.