Re: Where is the qmail Licence?

Frank Louwers writes:
 > 1) The terms are not clear

Dan's terms are quite clear: you can distribute unmodified source.
You can distribute binaries if they're the same binaries that a user
would get by running 'make setup check' against unmodified source.

 > 2) Dan states that "if you don't do it my way, you have to ask
 > permission" ...
 > 
 > I've mailed him more than once, he refuses to answer my questions...

What does that tell you?  It should tell you that you don't have
permission.

 > What I am objecting to, is that is has no clear license, and that he
 > won't answer mails about the license.

The license is quite clear -- you just wish it said something other
than what it says.

-- 
--My blog is at angry-economist.russnelson.com  | Can I recommend python?
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | Just a thought.
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | -Dr. Jamey Hicks
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   |