Re: approved patches
Toni Mueller <[email protected]> Thu, 27 May 2004 10:24:20 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.qmail.dist |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, On Wed, 26.05.2004 at 18:55:44 -0400, Peter Samuel <[email protected]> wrote: > netqmail is distributed as a _source_ code bundle that includes > qmail-1.03.tar.gz along with a number of valuable patches and a simple build script. ok, misunderstanding cleared. > In accordance with Dan Bernstein's distribution rules, netqmail is NOT > distributed in _binary_ form. Well, so far I was under the impression that Dan Bernstein did not even approve of installer packages. > If you plan on distributing a binary of qmail you should adhere to Dan's ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I don't think so... As nice as it could be, the rules set by Dan are incompatible with the SME user's demands from what I think they are, and who would be my target audience for this kind of thing. I'd rather not infringe on his conditions, although (at some other occation?) someone told me that the expiry dates on some related packages are not to be taken too seriously... reminds me of taking a closer look at 'runit'... Best, --Toni++