Re: eQmail or s/qmail

On 2016-05-15 11:34, [email protected] wrote:
> In linux most packages are distributed as rpms; packages providing
> additional functionality also come that way making maintenance easier.
> Additional configuration should be well structured. A good example
> being Apache. Qmail, somehow, never took that route. That is why it
> takes a specialist to use qmail and they are invariably in short
> supply.
> 
> -C
AFAIR the original license didn't allow to distribute qmail as binaries. 
Some distros have had packages later on. They removed them - may be 
because a lack of maintenance. FreeBSD and Gentoo have still a netqmail 
package in their repos. Anyhow, creating packages from sources should be 
the job of the package maintainers of their distro.
-- 
----
Sent with eQmail-1.10-dev