Re: Qmail-LDAP with greylist and greetdelay support

Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.qmail.ldap
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Robert MÃŒller wrote:
> Hello Hugo,
>
> sounds good - I'll try them when they are online.
> Regarding policyd, I currently prefer a stepwise approach. Atm I use 
> the debian-packaged postfix-policyd (v1.80) in order to quickly get 
> things to work (This was now successful, thanks again to José). After 
> getting first impressions and understanding how things work, I want 
> also to check out policyd v2. Do you have any preferences or caveats 
> for one of them?
>
> Cheers,
> Robert
>
>

I've only worked with v1 so far.

For the type of setup i've been using, which is restricted to servers 
that handle incoming mail (MX), it has been working very well. The 
ability to handle outbound mail as well, either from allowed relay 
clients or authenticated users, in single server setups (one machine 
does it all), must be addressed a bit differently though. That's because 
v1 will only allow an all-or-nothing kind of approach. You might want to 
use greylisting and helo checking for inbound mail only and throttling 
for outbound mail only, and v1 does not allow rule differentiation.

I've been looking at a legacy policyd v1 patch that implements 
whitelisting scopes which is a way to handle this problem. Another 
possibility, relying on existing documentation, is to use v2 instead. v2 
supports class definition allowing different rules to be applied to 
different objects, them being individual users, client addresses or even 
netblocks/domains.

My main concerns about v2 right now are actually just 2:

Performance - It's perl based, while v1 is entirely C, there WILL be 
some overhead.
Data migration - v2 still lacks the appropriate migration tools. The 
database layout is completely new and it would be really nice to be able 
to reuse existing data.

Hopefully the new versions of qenvscan-policyd and the qmail-ldap patch 
will allow the use of both versions, patched or unpatched. Of course an 
unpatched v1 version will always have the limitations i refered.

Regards,

Hugo Monteiro.

-- 
ci.fct.unl.pt:~# cat .signature

Hugo Monteiro
Email	 : [email protected]
Telefone : +351 212948300 Ext.15307
Web      : http://hmonteiro.net

Centro de Informática
Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da
		   Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Quinta da Torre   2829-516 Caparica   Portugal
Telefone: +351 212948596   Fax: +351 212948548
www.ci.fct.unl.pt	      [email protected]

ci.fct.unl.pt:~# _
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.