Re: Qmail-LDAP with greylist and greetdelay support

Hello Hugo,

sounds good - I'll try them when they are online.
Regarding policyd, I currently prefer a stepwise approach. Atm I use the 
debian-packaged postfix-policyd (v1.80) in order to quickly get things 
to work (This was now successful, thanks again to José). After getting 
first impressions and understanding how things work, I want also to 
check out policyd v2. Do you have any preferences or caveats for one of 
them?

Cheers,
Robert



Hugo Monteiro schrieb:
> Robert MÃŒller wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks a lot, seems to work!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Robert
>>
>>
>>
>> Jose Celestino schrieb:
>>> Words by Robert MÃŒller [Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:24:55PM +0100]:
>>>  
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Be careful: Continuation of an older post ;-):
>>>> I just took a look at your howto's and software (great work, 
>>>> really!) and decided to give greetdelay and policyd-integration a 
>>>> try. Unfortunately, the qenvscan-policyd binary doesn't run on a 
>>>> amd64 kernel. It compiles fine, but running it results in a 
>>>> segfault. I'm using Debian 5.0.
>>>> On a Debian 4.0 x686 it runs fine.
>>>> As I'm not a developer - can you please help?
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>
>>> Try the attached patch (couldn't try it as I don't have a policy server
>>> and whatever needed).
>>>
>>>   
>>
>
> Hello Robert,
>
> Hopefully, in the next few days i'll be putting a new version of 
> qenvscan-policyd online, along with the respective qmail-ldap 
> qmail-smtpd patch. You might want to check out those new versions 
> since they will allow throttling for authenticated users and 
> authorized relay hosts, which doesn't happen atm. José's patch will 
> also be included, of course.
>
> I'm also curious if you're deploying this with policyd v1 or v2.
>
> José, you're the man. A lot cleaner too! =)
>
> Regards,
>
> Hugo Monteiro.
>