Re: suggestion: a new "MeNotRecipient" destination folder
Marco Paganini <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.active-spam-killer.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Marc, Sorry immensely for taking so long. Please find my comments below. > The suggestion in this message is about a new, optional (and disabled by > default), "Bulkier" or "MeNotRecipient" destination folder, besides "Bulk" > and "Junk" folders. Messages that go into this folder do _not_ trigger a > confirmation request (just like the "Bulk" folder). > The motivation for this folder is to handle, as an ultimate > step after the mailing-lists step (see the graph at : > <http://www.paganini.net/ask/paper/node3.html>) messages that do not have > any of my addresses in clear in the message; i.e., neither "To: me" nor > "Cc: me" > These messages can be: > > (1) messages that were Bcc:'ed to me by people not present in my > whitelist > (2) messages from mailing-lists that were unfortunately not recognized > before, not even by the "all mailing-lists" catcher (see graph). > (3) and of course, for the majority of them: spams. > > > Let's detail each of the above categories:(...) > > <snip> This is not so hard to implement and I believe could be useful for some people. Please, open a feature request on sourceforge and I will take care of it. Unfortunately, I can't promise to change it right now, as things have been hectic for me. But given its rather low complexity, I believe I'd be able to code it without major problems. Regards, Paga -- Marco Paganini | UNIX / Linux / Networking [email protected] | PGP: http://www.paganini.net/pgp/ http://www.paganini.net | Magnus Frater te spectat... ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html