Re: Continuing the 'Not Training' trend --> bug in mailfilter.crm(?)

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 04:09:38PM +0200, Ger Hobbelt wrote:
> I forgot to mention, since you're using 'mailfilter', that
> 'mailreaver.crm' is the preferred way to go. (mailreaver is also the
> one that is promoted by Bill every time mail filtering comes up)
> Nice side benefit there is that mailreaver.crm only includes the
> 'second bit' of the problem, so your issue will be much less apparent
> with mailreaver, if at all.

I'm happy to switch to mailreaver.crm.  How would I train it with a
message? 

-roy

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone