Re: Mixed 64-bit system GerH binaries / BillYscripts --> two-sided training? YES!

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.crm114
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Monday, 01 September 2008 at 16:47, Bill Yerazunis wrote:
> 
> What Fidelis said is indeed what I was going to suggest if it were
> not for a bad net connection and a very unhappy 11-month-old.
> 
> But yes, try OSBF for now.  
> 
> Actually, one "good" justification for going to a "train both 
> positive and negative examples" in libcrm114 is that _in the special
> case of just two classes_ .  If you know (ahead of time) that you 
> only want a spam filter (and no advanced email sorting) then 
> you train one statistics file for spam-matching (positive training)
> and that's all.
> 
> Then, classifying with that file will yield a 
> 
>   "Best match to file #0 (spam.css)"
> 
> if it's spam, and the (new)
> 
>   "Best match to file #-1 (none_of_the_above)"
> 
> if it's not spam.
> 
> Advantages:
> 
>   1) most users will need only 1 statistics file (not two)
> 
>   2) if we go with 32-bit features, then the size of the statistics
>      file for Markov / OSB / OSBF will stay the same, but since you
>      only need one, then the overall disk footprint and cache requirement
>      will drop by a factor of two.
> 
>   3) you can still add other file types later.  It just may take a
>      little while to train them in.
> 
>   4) there will no longer be any difference in how you train classifiers;
>      Markovians will train the same as SVMs and neural nets.  No more code
>      dependencies!
> 
>   5) - and you will be able to mix different classifiers in the same 
>      CLASSIFY statement.
> 
> So, Ger, what does this look like in a portable 32/64-bit C:
> 
>    typedef struct mythical_new_bucket
>      { gimme_32_bits  hash;
>        gimme_32_bits  in_count;
>        gimme_32_bits  out_count:
>      } standard_bucketp;
> 
> Do I have to use uint32_t (which can't be printed by printf 
> without casting?  Or is there some other incantation that Just Works.

You could use unsigned int, which is 32bit on virtually every
standard-compliant system. OTOH, uint32_t can be printf'd with %d/%u
(or can you give an example where it can't?).

Regards,
R.

-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
Livna http://rpm.livna.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.