Re: 85.105.50.23
Turgut Kalfaoglu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.dsbl.admin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you for your reply.. I noticed that Open HTTP relay problem today and I believe I fixed it properly. It's the first time I am using squid as http_accelerator. I panicked when the email from your system got delayed somewhere, probably inside our system. Still, one email per week is too low, IMHO. Regards, -turgut Ian Gulliver wrote: >Turgut: > > > >>I just wanted to say that "one removal email per week" is cruel. >> >> > >Our "one removal email per week" rule has never applied to 85.105.50.23. >You've only had one removal email sent, and you've confirmed that and >are in the queue for delisting in 24 hours, 58 minutes. > > > >>We have been an adamant spam stopper (we have the only DCC server in the >>COUNTRY) >>but had to run a free-for-all sendmail for 3 days due to a network >>emergency and understaffing, >>and we are paying its price from queued emails by getting blacklisted by >>you and other organisations. >> >> > >You were listed in DSBL due to an open HTTP proxy on port 80; it had >nothing to do with sendmail. > > >