RE: 24.153.160.50

Good morning...
 
It has been over seven days since our last submission (2006/Dec/06 23:44:09 UTC) but w still can not submit request for removal. Would some one on your end please change what needs to be changed/updated so I amy again process the request?
 
Thank you,
 
Howard Manson, Systems Administrator
Infrastruct Security, Houston.
 

________________________________

From: Alexey Lobanov [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sun 12/10/2006 12:17 PM
To: postmaster
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DSBL-Contact] 24.153.160.50



Hello Howard.

10.12.2006 20:06, postmaster ?????:

> We are trying to accomodate your process and have verified from
> numerous sources there is no reason why we should be listed on your
> web site.
>
> We ahve tried the submittal process and accroding to your site...
>
> 2006/Dec/08 14:45:09 UTC      Removal Confirmation Sent EMail
> address: [email protected] Requestor IP:
> 75.24.222.219 Message Report: 24.153.160.50 accepted message. Remote
> host said: 250 2.6.0  <[email protected]> Queued mail
> for delivery
>
> This is the response your web site shows. We have tested this account
> from internal and external senders and have no problem receiving
> mail.

So, your previous tests were not comprehensive. Now you have found a
real severe bug in your mail system, and you really have to fix it.

http://dsbl.org/listing?24.153.160.50 provides good starting point for
bug hunting. You know the exact time, you know message-ID
<[email protected]>, and you definitely should be able to
track down the missing message inside of your mail system. There is a
chance that you will find also the missing message body during this
procedure.

>
> We can not find a email from you to reply too....??? Is this possibly
> a situation for exception?

Unfortunately, no. Please read the FAQ entries starting at
http://dsbl.org/faq-listed#exception

The most relevant one may be http://dsbl.org/faq-listed#randomlythrowsaway

>
> I noted the comment at the end "Queued mail for delivery" is that at
> your end?

No; it was YOUR server message. "Remote host said", and this remote was
24.153.160.50 aka mail.INFRASTRUCTSECURITY.com.

> The response saying it has come from "remote host" leads me
> to believe it is from us but we have checked the queue and there are
> no emails waiting for delivery.

Possibly, your logging level is insufficient. I am going to be online in
next hour, and I am ready to make manual test to check it.

>
> Can you please resend this reply request

Yes, 7 days later.

> as we are unbale to generate
> another one on your site.

Alexey
DSBL volunteer



>
> Thank you,
>
> Howard Manson, Systems Administrator Infrastruct Security, Houston,
> Texas
>
> [email protected]
> [email protected] or
> [email protected]
>