Re: 24.153.160.50

Hello.

On 14/12/06 17:02, postmaster wrote:

> Good morning...

It's dark evening here :-)

> 
> It has been over seven days since our last submission (2006/Dec/06
> 23:44:09 UTC) 

Sorry? I look at http://dsbl.org/listing?24.153.160.50 and see
2006/Dec/08 14:45:09 UTC.

Respectively, 7 days will expire 2006/Dec/15 14:45:09 UTC, now is Dec 14
14:17:46 UTC

> but w still can not submit request for removal. Would
> some one on your end please change what needs to be changed/updated
> so I amy again process the request?

Have you located and fixed the reason of the previous test message
disappearance?

If yes, please wait more one day and one hour.

Alexey

> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Howard Manson, Systems Administrator Infrastruct Security, Houston.
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Alexey Lobanov [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sun 12/10/2006
> 12:17 PM To: postmaster Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re:
> [DSBL-Contact] 24.153.160.50
> 
> 
> 
> Hello Howard.
> 
> 10.12.2006 20:06, postmaster ?????:
> 
>> We are trying to accomodate your process and have verified from 
>> numerous sources there is no reason why we should be listed on your
>>  web site.
>> 
>> We ahve tried the submittal process and accroding to your site...
>> 
>> 2006/Dec/08 14:45:09 UTC      Removal Confirmation Sent EMail 
>> address: [email protected] Requestor IP: 
>> 75.24.222.219 Message Report: 24.153.160.50 accepted message.
>> Remote host said: 250 2.6.0  <[email protected]>
>> Queued mail for delivery
>> 
>> This is the response your web site shows. We have tested this
>> account from internal and external senders and have no problem
>> receiving mail.
> 
> So, your previous tests were not comprehensive. Now you have found a 
> real severe bug in your mail system, and you really have to fix it.
> 
> http://dsbl.org/listing?24.153.160.50 provides good starting point
> for bug hunting. You know the exact time, you know message-ID 
> <[email protected]>, and you definitely should be able
> to track down the missing message inside of your mail system. There
> is a chance that you will find also the missing message body during
> this procedure.
> 
>> We can not find a email from you to reply too....??? Is this
>> possibly a situation for exception?
> 
> Unfortunately, no. Please read the FAQ entries starting at 
> http://dsbl.org/faq-listed#exception
> 
> The most relevant one may be
> http://dsbl.org/faq-listed#randomlythrowsaway
> 
>> I noted the comment at the end "Queued mail for delivery" is that
>> at your end?
> 
> No; it was YOUR server message. "Remote host said", and this remote
> was 24.153.160.50 aka mail.INFRASTRUCTSECURITY.com.
> 
>> The response saying it has come from "remote host" leads me to
>> believe it is from us but we have checked the queue and there are 
>> no emails waiting for delivery.
> 
> Possibly, your logging level is insufficient. I am going to be online
> in next hour, and I am ready to make manual test to check it.
> 
>> Can you please resend this reply request
> 
> Yes, 7 days later.
> 
>> as we are unbale to generate another one on your site.
> 
> Alexey DSBL volunteer
> 
> 
> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> Howard Manson, Systems Administrator Infrastruct Security, Houston,
>>  Texas
>> 
>> [email protected] 
>> [email protected] or 
>> [email protected]
>> 
> 
>