RE: Website link for 196.37.169.10

Thanks guys.

-----Original Message-----
From: Alexey Lobanov (dsbl) [mailto:[email protected]]=20
Sent: 20 December 2006 10:15 AM
To: Administrator
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 196.37.169.10

Hello.

On 20/12/06 09:04, [email protected] wrote:

> Hi there,I checked with my service provider and they confirmed that
the
> mail was delivered.

So, they agree with the DSBL team. We also tried to prove you that the
message in question was delivered to your system and was accepted by
your system.

> I hereby respectfully request that you resend the
> removal instructions

Yes, the 7-day counter have expired yesterday. Welcome to
http://dsbl.org/removalquery

> and will ensure that this mail will not get
> lost,deleted or undelivered.

The rest is your zone of responsibility. DSBL does not control your
mailserver and is not able to track down messages inside if your mail
system.

Alexey

>=20
> Keep up the good work
>=20
> Regards.
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Eudes ONFRAY [mailto:[email protected]]=20
> Sent: 18 December 2006 11:46 AM
> To: Administrator
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: RE: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 196.37.169.10
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --- Original Message ---
>> From: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 196.37.169.10
>> Date: Mon 18 Dec 2006 10:22:25 CET
>>
>> I checked and double checked,there was most definitely no messages
> from
>> you or any DSBL address.Please stop being sarcastic and lets get the
>> issue resolved.Do you want me to lodge another IP release to get the
>> process going again and are you going to tell me what mail address to
>> look out for or supply me with your phone number and international
>> code.I am willing to phone you to better explain the situation to
you.
>=20
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> All these  informations are available on
> http://dsbl.org/listing?196.37.169.10
> The removal message was delivered to 196.37.246.24 _Your_ server
replyed
> "250
> Ok: queued as 0DAB02C00ED" You should find this message ID 0DAB02C00ED
> in your
> server logs.
> As per RFC1123 section 5.2.9 the removal message was sent with an
empty
> reverse
> path. Please read http://dsbl.org/rfcinfo for more informations.
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> Jean-Eudes
> DSBL Volunteer
>=20
>=20
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alexey Lobanov (dsbl) [mailto:[email protected]]=20
>> Sent: 18 December 2006 11:05 AM
>> To: Administrator
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 196.37.169.10
>>
>> Hello Harold.
>>
>> On 18/12/06 11:49, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> Please inform me from whom the initial mail was sent as I can then
> log
>>> on to our service provider firewall to look for the mail in
> question.
>>> How
>>> can I respond to mail if I do not know from who or where the mail
> came
>>> from in the first place.
>> I repeat that the message contains plain English instruction related
> to
>> DSBL. And I assume that you follow basic e-mail standards and look
>> through all mail for your Postmaster and Abuse addresses. So, it will
> be
>> easy for you to recognize this message on your screen - same as you
>> recognize messages from me and answer me now.
>>
>>> That in itself is a security breach.
>> You needn't "respond" this mail. You have to read it and use HTTP URL
> in
>> it. However, this detail is not very important.
>>
>> Alexey
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Alexey Lobanov (dsbl) [mailto:[email protected]]=20
>>> Sent: 18 December 2006 10:05 AM
>>> To: Administrator
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 196.37.169.10
>>>
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> On 18/12/06 10:55, [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi there,from whom would the mail have been generated as I for
>>> security
>>>> reasons do not open mail from just anybody.
>>> Please meditate on RFC 2821, Section 4.5.1 (Minimum Implementation):
>>>
>>> "SMTP systems are expected to make every reasonable effort to accept
>>> mail directed to Postmaster from any other system on the Internet."
>>>
>>>> Please understand this as
>>>> South African domains gets hit by viruses on a daily basis.
>>> Please be informed that there are quite many production operating
>>> systems and mail reading programs not vulnerable to so-called
>> "viruses".
>>> Noone enforces you to use known virus-vulnerable systems and
>> application
>>> programs at your administrative workplace.
>>>
>>> Alexey
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> harold
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Alexey Lobanov (dsbl) [mailto:[email protected]]=20
>>>> Sent: 18 December 2006 09:18 AM
>>>> To: Support
>>>> Cc: [email protected]; Administrator
>>>> Subject: Re: [DSBL-Contact] Website link for 196.37.169.10
>>>>
>>>> Hello.
>>>>
>>>> On 18/12/06 09:49, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please remove IP 196.37.169.10 from your blocking list as all
>>> problems
>>>>> have been resolved. i have requested this to be done 7 days ago
> and
>>> it
>>>>> is still listed
>>>> Yes, because the request has died unfinished at your side. It is
> not
>>>> very interesting for DSBL that your mailserver accepts messages for
>>>> <[email protected]>; DSBL wants to know if someone really
> reads
>>>> the messages.
>>>>
>>>> Please:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Investigate what had hapened with the previous message and why
>>> noone
>>>> have read it. The message contained a trivial instruction in plain
>>>> English.
>>>>
>>>> 2. Start new delisting procedure and finish it in accordance with
> the
>>>> test message content.
>>>>
>>>> Alexey
>>>> DSBL volunteer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> =20
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> =20
>>>>>
>>>>> Harold Fouche
>>>>>
>>>>> Network administrator
>>>>>
>>>>> Paracon Holdings(for Kathea Communication Solutions)
>>>>>
>>>>> South Africa
>>>>>
>>>>> +27829223147
>>>>>
>>>>>
>=20