Re: 70.155.100.149 not listed but list.dsbl.org still fails lookup
Dick Wesseling <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Dec 2006 02:04:13 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.dsbl.admin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
George A. Petrick wrote: > The following is a snippet from the log file from MDaemon that shows what > happens if we use list.dsbl.org to try to trap spam - it does a great job on > the problem emails, and we really want to use it, but in this case, it > doesn't allow an email sent from me to Chuck in the same domain. I'm not familiar with MDaemon or its log files, so I don't know what "failed" means. If it means a DNS server failure (it is not unusual for one or two of DSBL's name servers to have a temporary problem, see http://dsbl.org/nsstatus) then that should not be a reason for rejecting the client. If "failed" means that MDaemon thinks that the client is listed, then there is something really strange going on. > Thu 2006-12-21 09:50:46: 'Recipient unknown' given and connection dropped to > divert future spam > > Thu 2006-12-21 09:50:46: --> 550 <[email protected]>, Recipient > unknown Is this normal behavior for MDaemon? If a client is listed (or a server is misconfigured!) then the DSBL name servers return a text message that refers to the DSBL site, e.g. "http://dsbl.org/listing?127.0.0.2". Mail servers are advised to include that string in their rejection message. This is particularly useful if the server is misconfigured. For example when using lists.dsbl.org (plural) instead of list.dsbl.org the DNS server returns "Your mail has been rejected because the server you are sending to is misconfigured and using dsbl.org incorrectly". "Recipient unknown" is not a message generated by the DSBL name servers. > Please help! Any information you can provide will be greatly > appreciated . My best guess is that the problem is MDaemon specific, did you already try their tech support?