Re: Website link for 202.64.178.2
Bert Driehuis <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Dec 2006 04:52:16 +0100 (CET)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.dsbl.admin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[ Note: I do not represent DSBL. I just track [email protected] to keep abreast of possible issues that might affect my use of DSBL, and occasionally I help out with questions. You may get responses from other subscribers to [email protected], possibly even with dissenting opinions. ] On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, [email protected] wrote: > Our email gateway server is listed on lists of "DSBL - Distributed > Sender Boycott List/list", "DSBL - Distributed Sender Boycott > List/unconfirmed", "sbl.dnsbl.net.au", and "t1.dnsbl.net.au". Please note that dnsbl.net.au is not associated with DSBL. > We try our best to keep our gateway secure always. And I found the > spam test is used the email address [email protected]. We do > have a email account [email protected] but our email gateway > do net a open relay. We change our server setting and not allow the > email account [email protected] to send any email to > internet. You may wish to disable all mail relaying for IP addresses not on your trusted network. Your server still happily relays for spammers who use your e-mail address as the "From" address on the SMTP envelope. The vendor of your "Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.5" can assist you with securing your servers relay function. > We found that our ISP do not support the reverse DNS for our > wmail gateway. We found difficulties to use the "DSBL: Request > Removal" to remove our gateway from the lists. Your ISP can assist you with setting up reverse DNS for 202.64.178.2 . Anonymous hosts cannot be removed from DSBL, sorry. > Would you please the help us with this case? Thanks a lot You will need assistance from your vendor to secure your relay function, and assistance from your ISP. No other parties can assist you in resolving these two problems. Your efforts are highly appreciated. Your efforts will come to full fruition after you have fully addressed both problems.