Re: 3.9.1-rc1: issue with classification user

Stevan Bajić wrote:
>
> {function a} -[calling]-> {function b} -[calling]-> {function c} -[calling]-> {function d}
>              |
>              +[calling]-> {function e} -[calling]-> {function d}
>                                        |
>                                        +[calling]-> {function f}
>
>
> This is the reason I wrote "it is not that simple".
>   

I love your explanations, so clear and easy to understand. :-)  .. a 
true expert.

If there was skill, time and motivation to change this, what would be 
the correct solution in your opinion?

1. Stay with 'a bunch of functions' but add better error communication 
between functions
2. Rewrite the complete structure using something other than 'a bunch of 
functions'  (aka Dspam 4 along with a LOT of other things half discussed)

Forgive me if the question has an obvious answer (in a developers eyes)



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by 

Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Dspam-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel