Re: Dspam dev status

Hi Tom,

Le vendredi 01 oct. 2010 à 10:07:50 (+0200), Tom Hendrikx a écrit :
> On 01/10/10 08:50, Eric Bischoff wrote:
> >> I'd be more pessimistic on this figure. The hash driver seems to be broken
> >> and I do not think another release should be done while it isn't fixed.
> >>
> >> However, I really think this should be fixed before a new release can
> >> happen.
> > 
> > Why is it so important? Because this is the default driver for Debian, Ubuntu and compatible distros. That means that basically, out of the box, dspam does not work as it should.
> > 
> 
> I think I have to disagree here. Release early, release often is imho
> the best way to work. 3.9.1 has some improvements over 3.9.0, and major
> improvements over 3.6.8/3.8.0.

I would normally agree with you, but in this particular case, the fact we
have no more active developer working on the project makes me reluctant to
have a new release for now… until someone is able to take over development.

It is not a question of Debian or not. The hash driver is a supported
backend, and must be fixed, whatever the default driver is in Debian,
Fedora, or whatever other distribution.

Cheers,
Julien

-- 
Julien Valroff <[email protected]>
http://www.kirya.net
GPG key: 1024D/9F71D449
17F4 93D8 746F F011 B845  9F91 210B F2AB 9F71 D449

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev

_______________________________________________
Dspam-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkylmSwACgkQIQvyq59x1ElehwCgsRWJle8xi4bsbmBPCsb/d2wo
aQMAoIn0ig3fvSzRs+QC9QPjrvZmUqZA
=OrY6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----