Re: Dspam dev status

On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:35:45 +0200, Julien Valroff <[email protected]> wrote:
> Le vendredi 01 oct. 2010 à 13:26:19 (+0200), Julien Vehent a écrit :
>> On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:30:52 +0200, Julien Valroff <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi Julien,
>> >
>> > Le vendredi 01 oct. 2010 à 10:20:20 (+0200), Julien Vehent a écrit :
>> >> On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 10:07:50 +0200, Tom Hendrikx <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > On 01/10/10 08:50, Eric Bischoff wrote:
>> >> >>> I'd be more pessimistic on this figure. The hash driver seems to be broken
>> >> >>> and I do not think another release should be done while it isn't fixed.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> However, I really think this should be fixed before a new release can
>> >> >>> happen.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Why is it so important? Because this is the default driver for Debian, Ubuntu and compatible distros. That means that basically, out of the box, dspam does not work as it should.
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >> What exactly is not working with the hash driver ?
>> >> I build 3.9.1 on debian squeeze and it works fine, so far.
>> >
>> > I think kthis thread sums up the issue:
>> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01740.html
>> >
>> > Also check the bugtracker (I think I remember some of the mail of the thread
>> > point to the bug tracker issues).
>> >
>>
>> Indeed. After trying the css* commands, it seems that the dictionnary of the user is broken...
>>
>> Oct  1 13:21:48 server dspam[11085]: Unable to open file for writing: /var/spool/dspam/data/example.net/user/user.css: Permission denied
>> Oct  1 13:21:48 server dspam[11085]: Unable to attach DSPAM context. Retrying.
>> Oct  1 13:21:48 server dspam[11085]: Unable to open file for writing: /var/spool/dspam/data/example.net/user/user.css: Permission denied
> 
> Are you sure this is the problem described in the thread?
>  


No, it's not. Sorry for the noise, I assumed the problem was caused by running the commands,since I had just done that, but in fact those commands have changed the ownership of the files from dspam to root, hence refused the permission to dspam.

So far, I can reproduce the segfault but my css files are still valid and working properly. 

Julien

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Dspam-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel