Re: Hashcash and GPGPU
Aaron Toponce <[email protected]> Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:09:23 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.hashcash |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 05:53:43PM +0200, Adam Back wrote: > I dont know about debian removing anything - didnt receive any comment to > that effect. While there has not be recent code changes, there have also > not been any bug reports so why fix whats not broken ;) Note there are > actual users of hashcash in its mail application for example via spam > assassin which is quite widely used (on the server side). So I think it > remains interesting to have support for hashcash on the client side. Yeah, take it with a grain of salt. I thought I had read it on the -devel mailing list, and I thought to myself "No, please no. I don't want to make it harder to implement it into Mutt." But, seeing as though I can't find it, meh. Take it with a grain of salt. --=20 =2E o . o . o . . o o . . . o . =2E . o . o o o . o . o o . . o o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o --tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://ae7.st/s/pgp iQEcBAABCgAGBQJP3eURAAoJEM55Ebf8BAiPHlIH/3vPOLlCgOAEgIJpMQ5mJzR9 thexts4sSzDYqoxtd/+oUd5o0ad88fV4YiWYay8yDbswTeiHh57VFqbAl98KhZ/X Y96DEmpn9StlibFrHBNZ+st73WJyUkSS6NIrut/QVy2p7i21Rq+Neqix/jP7u7de 2fW2J/8LriJo4Ax7Z8iHqAGhm61TX+D8ErTrKDqVFdDy7sZdBiqgyo/tCC9v9Mdd XSG1o8r+1SpRtfLCVVrPDtJdor7L3Zdtlp9Mjvccl2gCkv3oejDcCmAzZ0AIOh6m tUMbqNr8C6sPAVr/tQxKqsZONTiNOpAST7PPQMjDf6bF8foxFOutb1dYRxkIc/4= =bI/j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw--