Re: Hashcash and GPGPU

Aaron Toponce <[email protected]> Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:09:23 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.hashcash
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 05:53:43PM +0200, Adam Back wrote:
> I dont know about debian removing anything - didnt receive any comment to
> that effect.  While there has not be recent code changes, there have also
> not been any bug reports so why fix whats not broken ;) Note there are
> actual users of hashcash in its mail application for example via spam
> assassin which is quite widely used (on the server side).  So I think it
> remains interesting to have support for hashcash on the client side.

Yeah, take it with a grain of salt. I thought I had read it on the -devel
mailing list, and I thought to myself "No, please no. I don't want to make
it harder to implement it into Mutt." But, seeing as though I can't find
it, meh. Take it with a grain of salt.

--=20
=2E o .   o . o   . . o   o . .   . o .
=2E . o   . o o   o . o   . o o   . . o
o o o   . o .   . o o   o o .   o o o

--tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://ae7.st/s/pgp

iQEcBAABCgAGBQJP3eURAAoJEM55Ebf8BAiPHlIH/3vPOLlCgOAEgIJpMQ5mJzR9
thexts4sSzDYqoxtd/+oUd5o0ad88fV4YiWYay8yDbswTeiHh57VFqbAl98KhZ/X
Y96DEmpn9StlibFrHBNZ+st73WJyUkSS6NIrut/QVy2p7i21Rq+Neqix/jP7u7de
2fW2J/8LriJo4Ax7Z8iHqAGhm61TX+D8ErTrKDqVFdDy7sZdBiqgyo/tCC9v9Mdd
XSG1o8r+1SpRtfLCVVrPDtJdor7L3Zdtlp9Mjvccl2gCkv3oejDcCmAzZ0AIOh6m
tUMbqNr8C6sPAVr/tQxKqsZONTiNOpAST7PPQMjDf6bF8foxFOutb1dYRxkIc/4=
=bI/j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw--