Re: Hashcash and GPGPU

--lCAWRPmW1mITcIfM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 08:09:23AM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 05:53:43PM +0200, Adam Back wrote:
> > I dont know about debian removing anything - didnt receive any comment =
to
> > that effect.  While there has not be recent code changes, there have al=
so
> > not been any bug reports so why fix whats not broken ;) Note there are
> > actual users of hashcash in its mail application for example via spam
> > assassin which is quite widely used (on the server side).  So I think it
> > remains interesting to have support for hashcash on the client side.
>=20
> Yeah, take it with a grain of salt. I thought I had read it on the -devel
> mailing list, and I thought to myself "No, please no. I don't want to make
> it harder to implement it into Mutt." But, seeing as though I can't find
> it, meh. Take it with a grain of salt.

I found it: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D653532

--=20
=2E o .   o . o   . . o   o . .   . o .
=2E . o   . o o   o . o   . o o   . . o
o o o   . o .   . o o   o o .   o o o

--lCAWRPmW1mITcIfM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://ae7.st/s/pgp

iQEcBAABCgAGBQJP3eayAAoJEM55Ebf8BAiPhzEH/1oL2JBwwjCcm1qDNXd1AZFu
om5Q/RfLoB11k8Ev5FNrxjuinKyqhPOsD5tm9NvnT9FKBHEDvVDm8NGRTOKKGTsV
F1pmvOd4JR1Pvk56sAJvSqs0t36V2864yNNFAK0I/JrI58N94opHhyhkUgfLgcKZ
xqhlXPT43SIKsNvmsM1/DCk2wJ58oCQ3JV2HOaYkQqXt7t0x1eU4icJOtzbruY6B
FeywsXboTDSpuw8sLOuDo7ruFa3e7JYB1x7RNHN8I3OzsgLN81HI0GUULXQ3Epx4
QxSoTojF9a50+q4ttLKvSgD/ExPcRI1zlAfZ+/szehm2HuDnKcy3LTztnoBoQEA=
=uHvo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--lCAWRPmW1mITcIfM--