Re: [[email protected]: [Bug 78816] Hashcash support for Kmail]

I think the chances of someone installing a 3rd plugin are much lower
than enabling a tick box in built-in spam/prevention mail reliability
stamp dialog.  So for hashcash deployment builtin I presume would be
way better.

Adam

On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 09:25:28AM -0400, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> Adam Back wrote:
> 
> >Any dissent, send it to the bug url:
> >
> >http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78816
> 
> on one hand, if they are putting in a general-purpose filtering system, 
> then yes it does not make any sense to add a hashcash specific 
> extension.  If on the other hand, the goal is to make something easily 
> available and always there, then hashcash specific code should be present.
> 
> what's the goal?