Re: whitelist_auth return_path / from

>>On 03.07.24 23:54, Simon Wilson via users wrote:
>>>Simon Wilson via users skrev den 2024-07-03 14:56:
>>>>Do I also need to disable the normal SA DKIM plugin evaluation, i.e.
>>>>trusting my upstream authres_trusted_authserv only?
>>>
>>>both works in paralel, so no need to disable, best results came from 
>>>both enabled
>>>
>>>its up to you to add more authres_trusted_authserv or more 
>>>authres_ignored_authserv lines
>>>
>>>possible we can now have a very long debate on dmarc plugin ? :)

>Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2024-07-03 16:14:
>>Please, Simon, quote the text you are replying to.

On 03.07.24 17:47, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>i am not Simon

...I was not replying to you then.

Simon does not quote text he replies to, so it's hard to see who has written 
what.

compare your:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg111627.html

to Simon's:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg111628.html


>>>my question is does spamassassin dmarc plugin use authres results ?
>>not yet.
>
>also what i feared, but it should imho do
>
>also authres does imho not have spf_helo testing

Do you know anything that adds spf_helo to Authentication-Results ?
afaik pyspf-milter adds helo information only for DSNs

> have dmarc ?

yes
-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Honk if you love peace and quiet.