Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>On 18 Nov 2024, Bill Cole spake thusly: >> If you forward DNS queries instead of running your own *fully >> recursive* DNS resolver locally, you *look* like you are part of a >> high-volume leech. This almost certainly does not mean you should run >> dnsmasq locally, it means you need a REAL resolver. Unbound does a >> good job without the rococo config options of BIND. Many people also >> like the resolver half of the PowerDNS suite. On 18.11.24 18:18, Nix wrote: >I'm running BIND (actually, two BINDs, one authoritative one, one >recursive resolver). Sorry, I've been doing that for so long I forgot >any alternative was possible! :) Are you sure your provider does not intercept DNS queries? >> The point of the big ugly error message is to have a big ugly error >> message. MOST people who report problems with SA accuracy here have >> misconfigured their resolvers, apparently because they don't trust >> documentation or don't read it. > >Not me! This is something else. Maybe lkml is just too high volume... >God knows it's too high volume to actually *read* (I'm grabbing it for >grepping purposes and I really don't mind if SA doesn't RBL-scan mails >directed there -- it's all my other mail I want RBL-scanning.) looking at it RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL prodces 10s score, so little caching possible. >Yes, pretty much every non-paying customer is blocked... >On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 05:21:12PM +0000, Nix wrote: >>From https://knowledge.validity.com/s/articles/Accessing-Validity-reputation-data-through-DNS : > >> Starting March 1, 2024, Validity will allow up to 10,000 requests to anonymous users over a 30-day period. On 19.11.24 04:46, Matija Nalis wrote: >10k requests per 30-day period is about 333 queries/day. Or less than 14 queries per hour. >Not very much at all (and certainly at least order of magnitude less than your stated traffic). >No amount of local DNS caching is going to fix limits *that low*. yeah, this looks like blocking every non-paying user. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Linux - It's now safe to turn on your computer. Linux - Teraz mozete pocitac bez obav zapnut.