Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email.

On 19/11/2024 10:27, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>>> The point of the big ugly error message is to have a big ugly error
>>> message. MOST people who report problems with SA accuracy here have
>>> misconfigured their resolvers, apparently because they don't trust
>>> documentation or don't read it.
>>
>> Not me! This is something else. Maybe lkml is just too high volume...
>> God knows it's too high volume to actually *read* (I'm grabbing it for
>> grepping purposes and I really don't mind if SA doesn't RBL-scan mails
>> directed there -- it's all my other mail I want RBL-scanning.)
>
> looking at it RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL prodces 10s score, so little 
> caching possible.
>
>
>> Yes, pretty much every non-paying customer is blocked...
>
>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 05:21:12PM +0000, Nix wrote:
>>> From 
>>> https://knowledge.validity.com/s/articles/Accessing-Validity-reputation-data-through-DNS 
>>> :
>>
>>>  Starting March 1, 2024, Validity will allow up to 10,000 requests 
>>> to anonymous users over a 30-day period.
>
> On 19.11.24 04:46, Matija Nalis wrote:
>> 10k requests per 30-day period is about 333 queries/day. Or less than 
>> 14 queries per hour.
>> Not very much at all (and certainly at least order of magnitude less 
>> than your stated traffic).
>> No amount of local DNS caching is going to fix limits *that low*.
>
> yeah, this looks like blocking every non-paying user.
>
>
Not so sure. Have a full read of that link and see the last section 
"What do I do if I repeatedly receive this code?".