Re: HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE firing on html that looks ok

Matija Nalis <[email protected]> writes:

> The HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE is NOT triggering on my SA 3.4.1 with your
> ham.000 (only HTML_MESSAGE and DMARC/etc stuff is). 

3.4.1 is old and you are overdue for upgrade, but I can tell you know
that; mentioning it for other readers.

> I know this might sound annoying (that is not my intention!); but are you sure that:

It's fair; I ask the same sorts of questions.

> - this is really the exact file you've checking with "spamassassin -D -t" ?

Really sure.  The SPF stuff showed up as I was editing and rerunning.  I
can see the input file in the output.

> - that something in your extra rules did not override HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE test?

grepping local.cf I find nothing.   So I'm as sure as I can be.

> Well, maybe someone with SA 4.0.2 can check how it behaves for them;
> maybe it's a bug there (maybe only on NetBSD?)
>
> If I were you, I'd:
>
> - wait a little if someone can reproduce the issue with SA 4.0.2

This has happened already, on Ubuntu 26.04.  Thanks Andrew!

>   - however if bug is successfully reproduced in pristine NetBSD
>     Spamassassin 4.0.2, I'd fire up my editor and start adding dbg()
>     statements in that Mail/SpamAssassin/HTML.pm in anything
>     mentioning "size" (i.e. sub text_style() primarily) until I found
>     out what exactly is changing those $self->{max_size} and/or
>     $self->{min_size})

I think we have arrrived here, except it's not related to NetBSD.  And,
so far we have zero reports of failure to repo with SA 4.0.2 on any
platform :-)

It could be related to perl 5.42.0 (just making that up).

Your perl debugging advice appears sound.  Thanks for taking the time to
read and respond.