Re: HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE firing on html that looks ok
Andrew C Aitchison <[email protected]> Tue, 12 May 2026 12:35:45 +0100 (BST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 12 May 2026, Greg Troxel wrote: > Matija Nalis <[email protected]> writes: > >> The HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE is NOT triggering on my SA 3.4.1 with your >> ham.000 (only HTML_MESSAGE and DMARC/etc stuff is). > > 3.4.1 is old and you are overdue for upgrade, but I can tell you know > that; mentioning it for other readers. > >> I know this might sound annoying (that is not my intention!); but are you sure that: > > It's fair; I ask the same sorts of questions. > >> - this is really the exact file you've checking with "spamassassin -D -t" ? > > Really sure. The SPF stuff showed up as I was editing and rerunning. I > can see the input file in the output. > >> - that something in your extra rules did not override HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE test? > > grepping local.cf I find nothing. So I'm as sure as I can be. > >> Well, maybe someone with SA 4.0.2 can check how it behaves for them; >> maybe it's a bug there (maybe only on NetBSD?) >> >> If I were you, I'd: >> >> - wait a little if someone can reproduce the issue with SA 4.0.2 > > This has happened already, on Ubuntu 26.04. Thanks Andrew! > >> - however if bug is successfully reproduced in pristine NetBSD >> Spamassassin 4.0.2, I'd fire up my editor and start adding dbg() >> statements in that Mail/SpamAssassin/HTML.pm in anything >> mentioning "size" (i.e. sub text_style() primarily) until I found >> out what exactly is changing those $self->{max_size} and/or >> $self->{min_size}) > > I think we have arrrived here, except it's not related to NetBSD. And, > so far we have zero reports of failure to repo with SA 4.0.2 on any > platform :-) > > It could be related to perl 5.42.0 (just making that up). I'm on This is perl 5, version 40, subversion 1 (v5.40.1) built for x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-multi (with 48 registered patches, see perl -V for more detail) so it is a little wider than just 5.42.0 -- Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK [email protected]