Re: Need disk error checker for Windows XP
"anon" <[email protected]> Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:04:25 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.geeks |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Borgholio" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > POP wrote: >> "Chris F. Willoughby" <[email protected]> wrote in message >> news:[email protected]... >> >>>No, you CAN scan the whole drive.. but it will most likely ask you to >>>schedule it to do it on boot. Just check the option to scan all areas of >>>the disk or something like that. >>> >>>Chris >>> >>>"Borgholio" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>news:[email protected]... >>> >>>>I know that XP comes with the Chkdsk program, but I find it lacking in >>>>one important area...locating bad clusters. Scandisk for Windows 9x was >>>>able to scan the entire hard drive for bad clusters (including the free >>>>space). XP's Chkdsk only scans the areas that actually have data in >>>>them. I find this to be a bit stupid...to put it mildly. I know that >>>>Norton Utilities includes a disc scanner, but I don't see any way of >>>>purchasing it without buying the entire Norton Systemworks >>>>package...which is a form of evil that rivals even Microsoft. Any other >>>>suggestions? >>> >>> >> Correct, and it will also mark the bad sectors from use. >> >> Pop >> >> > > I'm sorry but I have to disagree with you both. I have found from > personal experience that you can take a damaged drive, freshly re-format > it, run chkdsk, and not find anything. Fill it with data, run chkdsk, and > it will locate bad sectors that never existed before. ** Question - I thought that when the disk was formatted that 'something' was written to all the sectors during the formatting procedure - therefore there IS something to 'check'. Why would one have to write something now in order for chkdsk to 'find' the bad sectors? -- A SpamCop user and forum reader, Not Admin ***