Re: One more time, please...

"WazoO" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.help
Organization SpamCop
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"J G" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>
> Know I've asked before, I think, but can't find much in the way of
> recomendations in the help docs and am lousy in searching the usenet.

Suggests that you haven't ried looking through the Forum yet.  One
current bit of discussion about speed (of both methods) is seen at
http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=3697

> Which method is preferred - forwarding spam as attachments or copy,
> paste, send?

The e-mail submittal was created to stop the whining about having
to sit on the screen all day, waiting for the paring engine to come
back with results.  The concept being .. hit the office, fire up the
e-mail, process the spam via e-mail submittal, get about doing
the real job .. as time became available during the day, then
do the follow-up of actually reviewing and reporting the parser
results.  (Unfortunately, this method became so fast, that now
we see the bitching about results not being provided immediately,
most newer folks not realizing that this was designed to be a
background process that ran at a lower priority)

> SC has been dragging pretty badly lately while I'm using
> copy/paste/report and what with 60-100 spam a day, I ain't got that time
> - specially if I get some gainful employment, which better be soon.
> Thanks...

And again, the normal suggestion is to report what you can,
delete the rest.  Some folks will focus on something like 'the
last dozen" ... the porn stuff" ... whatever suits you on the mix
of stuff that you get to see .. the premise being that someone else
is hopefully reporting the crap you're deleting ...
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.