Re: One more time, please...
"WazoO" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.help |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"J G" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > > Know I've asked before, I think, but can't find much in the way of > recomendations in the help docs and am lousy in searching the usenet. Suggests that you haven't ried looking through the Forum yet. One current bit of discussion about speed (of both methods) is seen at http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=3697 > Which method is preferred - forwarding spam as attachments or copy, > paste, send? The e-mail submittal was created to stop the whining about having to sit on the screen all day, waiting for the paring engine to come back with results. The concept being .. hit the office, fire up the e-mail, process the spam via e-mail submittal, get about doing the real job .. as time became available during the day, then do the follow-up of actually reviewing and reporting the parser results. (Unfortunately, this method became so fast, that now we see the bitching about results not being provided immediately, most newer folks not realizing that this was designed to be a background process that ran at a lower priority) > SC has been dragging pretty badly lately while I'm using > copy/paste/report and what with 60-100 spam a day, I ain't got that time > - specially if I get some gainful employment, which better be soon. > Thanks... And again, the normal suggestion is to report what you can, delete the rest. Some folks will focus on something like 'the last dozen" ... the porn stuff" ... whatever suits you on the mix of stuff that you get to see .. the premise being that someone else is hopefully reporting the crap you're deleting ...