Re: I know you're tired of hearing this, but ... re FAQs
"Pop" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.help |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
... > >>Aha, there's an intro to spamcop: >> Oh, it's for recipeints of spam reports. Jeez, I >> wish >> there was something I coujld tell WHERE to look in >> amongst all this stuff! > > OK, take a look now ... Index started ... help at > all? > > As they say, it's a beginning, ... but I'm inclined to not be very critical of you personally; there's a hormongous amount of good information on that page, and I think I understand the situation a lot better now. You've done an incredible job given what you have to work with. I'm also aware of Ellen's involvement and others too, FWIW. I've become pretty firmly convinced that it's a "system" problem more than anything else - you seem to have a good head around what's needed but you aren't getting the access & wherewithal that you need to accomplish it if I've read you correctly. I pretty much feel, and this is only my opinion of course, that what's needed can only be accomplished by someone knowledgeable (a la you, whoever), needs to splinter off if a usable format is going to develop. It'll have to be a team effort of a chosen group amongst the knowledgeable, but on the other hand that might easily lead to further separation of the intimacy wiht the "system". What I'm getting at is, it's a lost cause given the recent information you've provided and nothing is going to change anytime soon. I'm back now to some past opinions, not good, of the corporate attitude toward Spamcop in general. Once again, I'm done bitching unless I see something that makes improvement look possible. "Deja vue all over again". I'll try to quit rabble-rousing too, which is all I feel my comments accomplished. That wasn't the intent, really. Regards, Pop