Re: Batch processing?
"Mike Easter" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.help |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Spam Eviscerator wrote: > Is it possible to batch process spams that have been emailed to > spamcop? Doing it one at a time is incredibly tedious, especially > when I get 100 spams a day. Normal reporting by webparser submits one spam, sees one parser result, and selects one set of notifies to report, all in a relatively short time per submission. If several iterations of parsers are running 'in parallel', there's no wasted reporter waiting time for all of the processes. Normal reporting by email submission submits many spams and receives links to many parser results at a later time, which links are accessed one at a time for selections of notifies to report. The delay between emailing the bulk spam submissions and receiving the parser links varies. Multiple parallel browser iterations of the links again reduce waiting time. Pre-approved quick reporting by email submission submits many spams at a time, whose parser derived spamsources are assumed 'autoapproved' right or wrong with resultant reporting of all of the sources and no spamvertisers without further reporter action on any parser links required. SpamCop email clients can quickreport en masse directly from their held webmail. Because there is some hazard of errant reporting of parser errors by quickreporting, every configurable effort should be made to reduce the chances of reporting your own provider by configuring for mailhosts before any quickreporting begins. -- Mike Easter kibitzer, not SC admin