Re: Wondering about how SpamCop works two or more users]
"Mike Easter" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Patty wrote: > I only know that I've been told the log trace from Covad is showing > only one person reporting. I'm assuming that what covad gets is the SC report of being spamsource provider. A SC report will provide a link to the evidence, but the report is sent from spamcop, not the reporter, regardless of whether that is a single repetitive IP address, it only means the source of the report remains the same, namely spamcop's IP. The reporter's addy in the evidence To would be munged by standard or default SC munge unless overridden by some action of the reporter or requirement of the notified provider, and the evidence itself would permit analysis of the headers of the mailing list item/s which were received by the reporter. <now the guessing and assuming gets more 'loose' and 'guessy'> Those items would show the 'mailbox' server for the recipient, such as AOL, but if any addresses of the recipient would have appeared in the recipient's headers in such as Received tracelines, those too would have been spamcop munged by the standard or default algorithm function on the handling of the evidence which is linked in the report to the providers for spamvertiser or source. So, the point of that long description is that I would think that the conclusion might be that all of the reports are being received by a user of only one provider, namely AOL, but not necessarily one 'person' -- since I'm thinking the person isn't being identified by username address, but only by mailbox server. -- Mike Easter kibitzer, not SC admin