Re: Does it work?
Skiwi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Gareth wrote: > Hi > > I am new to spamcop. I recently opened an email account with my ISP > which has obviously been used before and receives around 10 spams per day. > I have been reporting all the spam for nearly a month now but have not > noticed any change in the volume of spam I receive. > Is this normal? Should I persevere or are these spammers just too good > at avoiding being being blocked? sorry if this seems like I am teaching you how to suck eggs... to reiterate what many have said here, via a bad analogy, by using spamcop (and by using, I mean reporting, as it sounds like you are doing...) then you are helping build a forcefield around the spammer's email sources - and we all thank you for helping 'us' build that field, otherwise know as the SpamCop block list (SCBL)... The problem is, you are helping to build the force field from the *spammer's side* - you need to get on the other side (I DID tell you it was a bad analogy!!) There are many ways of doing this, but the three main 'groups' of ways that I see are: (1) using an ISP or some service online that uses the SCBL (and other lists and algorithms such as SpammAssasain) to re-direct the spam somewhere safe *before* you download it, where you can check it on a semi-regular basis to make sure it is spam, report it, then dump it... (for instance, Spamcop offers this mail filtering service themselves, allowing you to (semi) transparently keep your *current* email address and run it through the service' I use it and love it, very elegant and yet fully customisable interface, $50 a year, and you ALSO get another email address that I use for online shopping, newsgroups, etc as I know it is being heavily 'checked'; it also supports 'plusage', so I have [email protected], [email protected] or whatever so if I do get spam I can often see who leaked my email, if I feel so inclined [these are not 'real' email addresses BTW]) (2) get a service that 'intercepts' the mail on your PC *after* it comes off the mail server and been downloaded but *before* it gets to your email software and treats appropriately - i.e., the good stuff is let straight through, the bad is <whatever action you want, kinda>; for friends who don't care how it works, just don't want to see spam in their In Box I use SpamPal (free, but 'donation' encouraged) on Windoze OSs and it seems to be pretty 'set and forget' (but you can tweak it as you need, if for instance it is being too aggressive) (3) you likely know about this one - this doesn't use the SCBL or other BLs, etc - but any decent email software such as Thunderbird (and even bad email software such as Outlook - woops, is my prejudice showing...) has junk filters now... kinda "AI" - when you first start using it, you manually mark spam as junk, it will trundle itself off to a sub-folder where you can deal with it; as you use the software more and more, it gets smarter and smarter (sic!) about what you consider spam and marks it itself - and you can easily un-mark (sic) it - and if say you are on a list about, I don't know, rooster husbandry, you can whitelist incoming addresses (i.e., tell the software that any email from that address will never be junk) Anyway... Just a point - I used 'force field' rather than 'wall' in my analogy as in a sense the SCBL is a vibrant, dynamic list; as spammers get through it, 'we' report spam from these sources and that hole is now plugged AND if a previous sources 'cleans up its act' it will (eventually) come off the SCBL and email from there can flow freely through to those of use using the SCBL between the emails sources and their In Boxes...