Re: Chaintest not working, or spammer trick?

"Geoffrey Hyde" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
news:[email protected]...
> http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z947668478zeb1d52e378e4916c06b1227e96e6c343z
>
> Why does SC bother with the part about "such-and-such is not a MX for 
> bigpond?  As far as I know bigpond will receive mail from anywhere.  I'm 
> wondering if SC has had a change or update which changes the way it 
> considers my ISP's mail configuration.
>
> In the above example, SC might have chaintested successfully, if it had 
> accepted that bigpond will receive mail from anywhere on the internet.
>
> Or I could be reading the parse wrong - I have reported it as SC found it, 
> in case this is some spammer trick.
>
> Anyone know whether the ISP SC notified is correct?
>
>
> Cheers ...
>
> Geoffrey Hyde
>
SpamCop is also NOT adding IP sources for scoring to it's SCBL
84.20.170.193 shows that it has had no reports yet made?
This link is for SpamCop email users which shows a "register" of IP's
http://mailsc.spamcop.net/sc?track=84.97.161.139