Re: Blue Frog calls it quits?
Michael Brennan <"Michael Brennan <Nobody"@SpamCop.devnull.diespammerdie.net>> Fri, 19 May 2006 17:14:58 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | Not So's You'd Notice |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Vanguard wrote: > > > Amazing how many BS users bought into the scheme to have their hosts > running as zombies in a DDOS attack. Most users expend effort using > anti-virus and anti-malware products to prevent their hosts from > becoming zombie slave hosts. How would you prefer to tackle the problem that Blue Frog took on? What strategy would you suggest? SpamCop uses reporting for the benefit of blocklist users, so that's a client-side answer. The previous thread discussed the unwillingness of major ISP's to tackle the problem by black-holing other major ISP's and NIC's whose executives have chosen to take the spammers' money and forget about the Net. We haven't even gotten into the implications of U-CAN-SPAM and its (Stateside) redefinition of spam by the Direct Marketing Association, with the rentable help of a sleazy Louisiana congressman. Your turn. Just curious, Michael