Re: OpenSSL's MD5?

Stefan Walter <[email protected]> Tue, 3 Jan 2006 15:00:12 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general
Organization Infinity Approximation Task Force
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Brian Burton, 03.01.06, 14:29h CET:

> Stefan Walter wrote:
> > There aren't any patches required to make it work, but I'd like to ask for
> > a configure switch to explicitly enable/disable libungif support.
> > Currently, this is done by (not) adding the include path for gif_lib.h so
> > that configure either finds it or not. That works, but I consider it a
> > hack that could be easily avoided with an appropriate switch.
> 
> Sure.  Something like --without-libungif?  I'll roll that into the next 

That would be fine, thank you!

> release.  I plan to add support for jpg and png as well.  Do you think 
> these should be enabled/disabled separately?  Or maybe as a single 
> option such as --without-images or --disable-images?

Hm...I don't have a strong opinion on this. I don't know if there are
scenarios in which people would want to check only GIF attachments, but
not JPEGs or PNGs. A single option would probably be enough.

Regards,
Stefan
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 650 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)
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=ZDNk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----