Re: A new use for Spamprobe - Interestingness vsHo-hum Boring

On Jun 7, 2006, at 7:57 PM, David Lee wrote:
> A mult-dimensional bayesian filter could likely do the trick , but  
> trying to
> get spamprobe to do it, I suggest, is not going to be so easy ... or
> desirable.

I agree with David.  While N-way bayesian filtering seems pretty cool  
I didn't see enough value in it to incorporate it into SpamProbe.  It  
has always seemed to me that mailing lists are easy to sort out using  
procmail (or whatever) which the person probably already has  
installed for use with spamprobe.

All the best,
++Brian