Re: A new use for Spamprobe - Interestingness vs Ho-hum Boring

Brian Burton <[email protected]> Thu, 8 Jun 2006 10:53:31 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Jun 7, 2006, at 5:52 PM, John Carter wrote:
> Now it occurs to me, if I could get a second spamprobe in that  
> pipeline
> using a completely different database I could create a new  
> division, or
> perhaps new ranking in my mail.
>
> Interesting to Me vs Ho Hum Boring!
>
> Question 1 :
>    Has anyone tried this?

I haven't tried this but it ought to work just fine.  Just classify  
your interesting emails as "good" and the others as "spam".  Let us  
know how it works out.

> Question 2 :
>    What fixed system resources does spamprobe use could screw up this
>    Plan for Ham? How could I hack around that. The obvious one is
>    the database. Any lock files, etc?

Just the database.  Each database has its own lock file.  To do this  
you'd need to make a second database in its own directory (maybe  
~/.spamprobe2) and pass that directory to SP with the -d option (i.e.  
spamprobe -d ~/.spamprobe2 train) when you invoke it on the second  
email.

All the best,
++Brian