Re: A new use for Spamprobe - Interestingness vs Ho-hum Boring
Brian Burton <[email protected]> Thu, 8 Jun 2006 10:53:31 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jun 7, 2006, at 5:52 PM, John Carter wrote: > Now it occurs to me, if I could get a second spamprobe in that > pipeline > using a completely different database I could create a new > division, or > perhaps new ranking in my mail. > > Interesting to Me vs Ho Hum Boring! > > Question 1 : > Has anyone tried this? I haven't tried this but it ought to work just fine. Just classify your interesting emails as "good" and the others as "spam". Let us know how it works out. > Question 2 : > What fixed system resources does spamprobe use could screw up this > Plan for Ham? How could I hack around that. The obvious one is > the database. Any lock files, etc? Just the database. Each database has its own lock file. To do this you'd need to make a second database in its own directory (maybe ~/.spamprobe2) and pass that directory to SP with the -d option (i.e. spamprobe -d ~/.spamprobe2 train) when you invoke it on the second email. All the best, ++Brian