Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:28:55 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 08/03, Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] wrote: > I've started getting spams that I can easily identify by appearance, > and spamprobe has flagged them *all* as good, even though I've retrained > it on each one as it has come in. I haven't found a solution to this with spamprobe, but the author of CRM114 says it always catches these. My *guess* is that the primary difference is in the tokenizing. -- "I'd rather be happy than right any day." - Slartiblartfast, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy http://www.ChaosReigns.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642