Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Brian Burton <[email protected]> Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:40:39 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] wrote: > On 08/03, Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] wrote: >>I've started getting spams that I can easily identify by appearance, >>and spamprobe has flagged them *all* as good, even though I've retrained >>it on each one as it has come in. > > I haven't found a solution to this with spamprobe, but the author of CRM114 > says it always catches these. My *guess* is that the primary difference is > in the tokenizing. If you give CRM113 a try please let me know how well it works in real life as opposed to what the author reports. Most likely you are describing an image spam with technical jargon as text. I think SP's image tokenization needs improvement to catch these. Thanks, ++Brian ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642