Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:32:22 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 31 Oct 2006, Brian Burton wrote: > Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] wrote: > > On 08/03, Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] wrote: > >>I've started getting spams that I can easily identify by appearance, > >>and spamprobe has flagged them *all* as good, even though I've retrained > >>it on each one as it has come in. > > > > I haven't found a solution to this with spamprobe, but the author of CRM114 > > says it always catches these. My *guess* is that the primary difference is > > in the tokenizing. > > If you give CRM113 a try please let me know how well it works in real > life as opposed to what the author reports. > > Most likely you are describing an image spam with technical jargon as > text. I think SP's image tokenization needs improvement to catch these. > > Thanks, > ++Brian > > Like everyone else, it seems, I'm getting a lot of these too and only a few are caught. If they become more frequent it will be quite a nuisance. I can't find anything on Google about crm113 but I have found a crm114 at http://crm114.sourceforge.net/. Is this a good one to try? Anthony -- Anthony Campbell - ac-MeA/[email protected] Microsoft-free zone - Using Linux Gnu-Debian http://www.acampbell.org.uk (blog, book reviews, on-line books and sceptical articles) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642